Saturday, July 17, 2010

Fencing Literature


There have been many books written on fencing, excellent ones and others which, though interesting, are less memorable. I wold like to briefly review and strongly recommend several "armchair" fencing books, not treatises on the art per see, but of interest to fencers or any xiphophiliac in general.

I. Sentiments of the Sword, by Sir Richard
Francis Burton.
Sir Richard Francis Burton was a famous Victorian explorer, linguist, and a great devotee of swordsmanship. Though The
Sentiment of the Sword is not as well-known as another of his writings, The Book of the Sword, in many ways I consider the former to be much more interesting. The book is set in the form of a smoking-room dialogue between several upper-class, sophisticated Victorians, who over the course of nine evenings discuss assorted aspects of fencing, centering on the sword's development and its use through the centuries. Though the prose is Victorian and interspersed with French and Latin phrases, Burton's deep knowledge of swordsmanship shines out, making this an invaluable text for understanding Victorian era fencing.

Attatched is a link to an online copy of Burton's book: http://ejmas.com/jnc/jncart_burtonsentimentswordcontents_0300.htm


II. Les Secrets De L'Epee, by Baron Cezar De Bazancourt.
The "Secrets of the Sword" was written at a time when the norm
s of academic
foil fencing were being challenged by the introduction of epee as a fencing weapon. Bazancourt's text is an amazing insight into the revolution of fencing thought that hit late 19th century France. Also set in the form of a smoking-
room dialogue, Les Secrets De L'Epee considers three types of fencing: "graceful athletic exercise...exact science...and practical self-defense" (William M. Gaugler). The contrast between dueling swordplay and academic swordplay is the main focus of "Secrets", in particular the question--of high concern among
fencers at the time--of whether or not epee fencing would render the foil obsolete. If you want to understand why we have both foil and epee in modern fencing, this is the book to read.


III. The Secret History of The Sword, J. Christopher Amberger

Mr. Amberger has put together a delightful compendium of excerpts and
commentary related to European combatives, from the ancient world to the
present. This book is not so much a straightforward history of fencing as much as a tour through some of the most fascinating aspects of western fighting arts. These include firsthand accounts of German mensur duels by the author, an exploration of Greco-Roman combat, Renaissance prizefights, and especially a look at the origins of modern sabre target. I highly, highly recommend this book to all who are interested in anything even remotely related to swords. I would also recommend Mr. Amberger's blog:


IV. On Fencing, Aldo Nadi.
Okay, this is a fencing treatise. However, it is probably the most complete treatise on classical foil fencing that has ever been penned, and was written by one of the greatest fencing minds of all time. Aldo Nadi's words ring with mastery, on a par with Miyamoto Mushashi's Book of Five Rings. I cannot recommend this book highly enough. Read it! More than once!





V. The History of Fencing, William M. Gaugler
If nothing else, Maestro Gaugler's work is definitely the authoritative text on the development of modern European fencing. His prolific scholarship has, in a single volume, covered more than five hundred years of fencing thought, from Achille Marozzo in the 16th century to Giorgio
Pessina in the 20th. This work examines major fencing treatises of each century, examining the development of technical expertise as well as the slow change in fencing from duel to sport. Each text is systematically described, on to the last detail, and while some may not enjoy reading The History of Fencing for long sittings, it is a handy reference to the major developments in the art and science of swordsmanship. Maestro Gaugler's work is an excellent summary of the teachings of great masters of the past, and aids us in understanding where we came from and where we are as fencers today.



VI. L'Ecole Des Armes, Domenico Angelo
The eighteenth century produced many great fencing masters, and Domenico Angelo ranked near the top. Born in Leghorn, Italy, Angelo received his certification as a maitre d'armes from the National Academy in Paris. He moved to London and founded Angelo's School of Arms--l'cole des armes--where both his son and grandson taught well into the 1800's. Among his most famous students were the Prince of Wales, later George IV, and Johann Christian Bach, son of the great composer. In 1763 Angelo published his masterpiece, a classic work on fencing which was instrumental in the development of fencing as a sport. L'Ecole Des Armes saw numerous editions, and was extremely popular. The elegance, poise, and grace which were the hallmark of Angelo's style, can be seen clearly in the book, which outlines the basic principles of swordsmanship and then moves on to the more complicated actions, and finally concludes with instructions on dealing with opponents armed with various weapons, such as smallsword and lantern. The finest feature of Angelo's work, in my opinion, are the lavishly illustrated plates which abound in the text. These are worthy of hanging on a wall to admire, as they accurately capture the elegance of fencing as it was in the 1700's.

Friday, July 16, 2010

Via!Hup!


Last October, I was invited by a friend to visit the Fencing Master's Program, located in San Jose, California. This was an opportunity not to be missed,as the FMP is one of a kind: a rigorous training program intended to produce some of the finest Classical Italian Fencing teachers in the world. Founded at San Jose State University in 1979 by Dr. William Gaugler, who holds a fencing master's diploma from the Accademia Nazionale di Scherma in Naples and was trained by such greats as Aldo Nadi, Umberto Di Paolo, and Giogio Pessina. The program's certifications are internationally recognized and endorsed by the Italian Fencing Masters Association.

My experience of the Fencing Master's Program was a positive, if somewhat grueling one. I attended two sessions over the weekend, an hour and a half on Friday night and then five hours on Saturday. The sessions included a brief footwork session which doubled as a warmup, then a division of attendees into teachers and students, myself in the latter category. On Friday night, my instructor was Mr. Jeremy Tavan, who thankfully was patient enough to clearly explain some of the finer points of the Italian system. Earlier that afternoon I had also received a short lesson from Mr. David Cogley, who had been kind enough to invite me down to San Jose. The teaching system of the FMP is based off of the old Scuola Magistrale in Rome, and so is entirely a classical method of fencing, in its turn being based off of five centuries of dueling practice. On Saturday, I received an excellent five-hour lesson in fioretto (foil) and sciabola (sabre) from
Maestro Gary Murray. In addition, I recieved pointers from both the Maestri Sahms. I don't know how many lunges I did over the weekend, but I was definitely sore afterwards. I really enjoyed myself, however, and learned a lot about the Classical Italian system, both in terms of technique as well as the interrelatedness and unity of Italian theory and tactics. Via! Hup!


Monday, March 1, 2010

You'd Have To Be A Little Mad...


Sabre.
What an interesting, violent weapon. Fortunately for modern fencers, the sporting sabre is a lightened version of its dueling progenitor, and so does not really cause bodily harm. It's a bit like fencing with a car antenna, apt to leave you a good welt if you don't parry properly. Though devotees of the foil and epee probably outnumber those of the sabre, there's little doubt that the latter is the most flashy and swashbuckler-like out of the sport's ferrous triumvirate. What makes it so different from the other two weapons?
Well, the main factor is the method of scoring and target area. In sabre, the entire front edge of the y-shaped blade can be used to score, as well as the back third of the blade, called variously the back edge, false edge, short edge, etc. Additionally, the point may be used to score. The target area is considered to be everything above the hipline. The sabre is the fastest of all three weapons, and in fact is the fastest moving object in sports, second only to a bullet.

Personally, the thing I like about the sabre is its swashbuckling appeal, as well as being an extremely interesting game. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy all three weapons, but the sabre is really unique. It requires a certain wildness to fence sabre, to get used to the biting factor that people call the sabre's edge. You have to be at least a little mad to enjoy sabre.

Since the 1980's sabre fencing has been radically changed due to the electrification of the weapon. Like foil in the 1950's, technology has altered the way one approaches a bout. In order to counterbalance the sheer speed of electric sabre, the rules of right-of-way have been mutated to give priority to the fastest fencer, and rendering the parry-riposte obsolete. For an example of electrical sabre fencing click here:

There are still quite a few fencers like myself who prefer the older standard sabre game. In standard competition, one has to demonstrate a clear hit to a jury of four side judges, and so despite the speed of sabre fencing, standard sabre retains the classic phrase d'armes or exchange of blades. Both fencers strive to gain right-of-way, and when the fencing is clean and clear it is quite aesthetically beautiful. Here's a couple examples of good old-fashioned standard sabre fencing:www.youtube.com/watch?v=0he1WjgBPhQ


and finally for a contrast between dueling sabre and sporting sabre styles:

Anyway, there's some of my thoughts about sabre.

Good Fencing!